Hippocratic Hypocrisy - A MUST SEE learn how medicine was hijacked and perverted by the elite
A collaborative film by Spacebusters and Dr. Andrew Kaufman about how authentic medicine was hijacked by the power elite and turned into a deadly, sickness for profit industry.
HIPPOCRATIC HYPOCRISY: Stunning New Documentary & Health Freedom Action Plan
Welcome to Part 2 of the Solutions Project here on Snooze 2 Awaken. In Part 1 I focused on the pioneering macroeconomic model called One Small Town developed by Michael Tellinger.
Today I’m returning to the field of health, and specifically virology, to propose a concerted strategy for exposing fraudulent science and freeing ourselves from the current medical model based entirely on lies that systemically and systematically breaks its own oath by actually trying (it would seem) to do more harm than good.
And when I say more than harm than good, I mean that in the most extreme way. By even conservative estimates, iatrogenic (doctor-caused) factors are the third leading cause of death in the United States. Some respected researchers claim that these statistics are fudged and that doctor-induced deaths are actually at the very top of the mortality totem pole.
Don’t believe me? Google this concept and see for yourself. The only honest response to this horrific truth should be along the lines of Vince Lombardi’s immortal words: “What the hell’s going on out here?!”
To cite author and journalist Jon Rappoport on this sobering subject:
Medical illiteracy in the population—the public health experts and the pharmaceutical titans feast on it. It allows them to get away with mass murder every day.
For those who think murder is too strong a word, I’ll close with this: it’s simple—when you’re in a profession that keeps killing and maiming people at a tragic and astonishing rate, and you know it and do nothing about it, you’re guilty. Period. No amount of evasion or excuse changes the fact.
Could there actually be a purposeful effort directed from the highest levels of the medical establishment (and perhaps even beyond) to suppress all forms of real medicine that fortify the body, mind, and spirit—while medicalizing expensive toxins and mutilations?
Are you aware that, before being turned on its head like everything else in our world, the word “quack” initially applied to allopathic doctors promoting the insane (by any humane and/or holistic standards) cut-remove-poison-and-kill model of medical warfare that is contrary to nature and antithetical to life?
Google that, too. And while you’re at it, look up something called Koch’s postulates and Rivers’ postulates. Specifically, see if you can uncover any proof, any whatsoever, that these postulates developed to prove the germ theory of disease have ever been fulfilled in the case of viruses or even bacteria.
Have a listen to what Dr. Thomas Cowan has to say on this subject in this recent interview that I highly recommend:
As Dr. Cowan indicates, you won’t find any proof of germ theory because there isn’t any. According to a plethora of researchers, including David Parker and Dawn Lester in their watershed review of medical literature, WHAT REALLY MAKES YOU ILL?, not a shred of honest science has ever been advanced to support the false (but immensely profitable—just ask the vaccine industry) claim that viruses and bacteria are infectious and cause disease.
Below, I provide a host of links—in addition to an amazing new documentary—that prove my point abundantly and redundantly.
But before we get there, allow me to entertain a possible question in readers’ minds, who might be asking themselves, “So what?”
Germ theory is emblematic of an inherently antagonist and oppressive worldview that sees others as threats. You can’t take away this mentality, by exposing and substituting for it a holistic, healthy, co-evolutionary outlook, without changing the world so thoroughly that our sociopathic and psychopathic controllers would be disempowered quickly and utterly.
The world is built from energy and consciousness. Going after the controllers exclusively is merely attacking an epiphenomenon without addressing the primary cause of our problems.
Thus what we really need to change, first and foremost, is our mindset. And this means being willing to correct—and if all else fails, reject—anyone still clinging to the warlike, either-or, us-versus-them model of human biology based on the fraudulent germ theory model that inevitably separates us from nature and each other.
And yes, this includes some ostensibly well-meaning voices in the health movement such as Drs. Judy Mikovits, Zach Bush, Rashid Buttar, VA Shiva and Dolores Cahill, who despite admitting some of the flaws in germ theory, still perniciously promote it even though it is 100% incorrect in all cases.
Mother Nature is never “infected” by “germs.” She allows bacteria to proliferate in certain areas of her “body” to detoxify it and/or recycle dead or dying “tissue.” Why on earth would the human body work any differently? Well, it doesn’t.
Specifically troubling relative to all of us trying to survive the current scamdemic is the persistent belief, even among otherwise enlightened scientists (Bruce Lipton comes to mind), that SARS-CoV-2 is a real virus, one that has been scientifically proved to exist (by being “isolated” or “purified”) and to cause a real illness christened with the scary name COVID-19.
But anyone, even a lay person, who has done the requisite looking into Koch’s postulates and Rivers’ postulates as applied to viruses, should know that no contagious virus has ever been isolated from a sick person and proved to be the cause of that person’s illness.
Here’s Dr. Andrew Kaufman in HIPPOCRATIC HYPOCRISY describing the sleight of hand used by today’s virologists who, unable to use logic and the scientific method to prove viral contagion for the simple reason that this isn’t how nature and the human body work, basically just make sh*t up:
Well, essentially, what they’re seeing under the microscope [and calling SARS-CoV-2] could very well be exosomes because they pretty much created a recipe to make exosomes because they’re usually using monkey kidney cells for this purpose and they’re mixing it with antibiotics. It’s well known that antibiotics induce exosomes … These cells are basically dying cells. They’re putting out all kinds of debris. Early on in the study of virology [i.e., using Koch’s postulates and then, when those proved impossible, Rivers’ watered-down but still unworkable version], they wrestled with this problem and pretty much gave up on trying to find a virus until this new technique that I described was invented. So we could very well be seeing exosomes in those pictures, but they could also be other kinds of cellular debris particles. The thing is, we don’t know because they’ve never taken those particles, purified them, and characterized exactly what they are. That’s never been done. The [PCR coronavirus] test is a little bit different [because] it doesn’t test for a virus at all. What that tests for is a sequence of RNA, which is genetic material. And the way they obtain [is] that they [also take an] impure sample—lung fluid [or a throat swab] in this case—from some people who are sick … and they amplify short little sequences … that they’re specifically looking for because they have this library of gene sequences of viruses … [T]hey’ve always characterized them this way. So they’ve never once had an intact virus particle, then sliced it open and taken the RNA out and done a sequence from end to end. That’s never been done. What they do, instead, is they take this impure sample and they look for a specific sequence that they’ve pre-identified as being viral in nature (from this database). And then, what they’re doing is amplifying these short little sequences—maybe 150-250 base pairs—and they’re splicing them together into this one long strand of 30,000, which they say is the viral genome. But it’s actually just this Frankenstein-type of assembly of all these little pieces that we don’t even have any proof [are] related. They could even come from different types of cells or different creatures. And when there’s gaps, they’re basically using sequences that they get from that database of other viruses that are also put together in this Frankenstein-type way. And they sew all those together and say that this is the genome sequence of this virus. And that’s the procedure. And they’re testing for something from that, but we don’t really know what it is—except it’s most likely our own sequences. So that’s why there are so many positive results, because they’re essentially testing our own genetic sequences. [emphasis added]
How I wish Mikovits et al. (to say nothing of their many enthusiastic, misled followers) would read this paragraph over and over while considering its far-reaching implications until the absurdity of virology’s so-called scientific methodology sinks in once and for all. Then, collectively, putting on our big boy and big girl pants, let’s do the right thing by taking the mental bowel movement known as virology and flushing it straight down the toilet where it belongs.
Links everyone needs to check out