⁣Are You Believing A Lie [Probably Alexandra]

lol im not a bot. just providing resources for people to educate themselves ( ͡ ͜ ʖ ͡ )✌

i think this guy is a REAL bot shane lol his replys make no sense and the not cannot understand the reply chain and how to use this site... def bot.

the bot*

@jasonsmith: hes juust very angry over FE. its not uncommon lol. unsubscribed to me to show me how dumb he thinks it is \)

@Great Gazoo: def a bot... the programmer of this bot is trash he makes szero sense reminds me of the NPCs on a cheap game on steam lol

@jasonsmith: You are right.

lmao. no one can help me?? haha. ill be alright. hands extended for when your ready man. no hard feelings

"It’s flat & motionless Folks! From the Pilot’s basic study guide; please read 1.1.2 & let that sink in! Every Pilot was taught this, but some still don’t get it, (I didn’t at first) & some just stay asleep & yes it does say ‘assumed’ but when does the theory become a spinning reality? Where is the next part B manual to apply Coriolis & curvature nonsense to any flight? Never...because it is a flat & stationary Earth we live & fly on. All flight planning & aerial navigation is based always on a flat motionless plane! Curvature or spin is never accounted for EVER ?☯️?" https://www.youtube.com/redire....ct?event=video_descr page 126: "The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth" https://www.youtube.com/redire....ct?event=video_descr

page 19: These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth. https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/p...

Flight Testing a VSTOL Aircraft NASA 1988 - page 9 pdf or 4-5 on actual doc: “For aircraft problems, the state and measurement models together represent the kinematics of a rigid body for describing motion over a flat, nonrotating Earth...” https://www.youtube.com/redire....ct?event=video_descr

Time to Climb page2: “In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat earth. https://www.youtube.com/redire....ct?event=video_descr

lol i dont care? i dont look into things before making statements and posting vids? Interesting. ive only watched 2577 videos hahahha

Flight Dynamics Summary http://www.aerostudents.com/co....urses/flight-dynamic "It’s flat & motionless Folks! From the Pilot’s basic study guide; please read 1.1.2 & let that sink in! Every Pilot was taught this, but some still don’t get it, (I didn’t at first) & some just stay asleep & yes it does say ‘assumed’ but when does the theory become a spinning reality? Where is the next part B manual to apply Coriolis & curvature nonsense to any flight? Never...because it is a flat & stationary Earth we live & fly on. All flight planning & aerial navigation is based always on a flat motionless plane! Curvature or spin is never accounted for EVER ?☯️?" https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/....nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa. page 126: "The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth" https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720012071 Determination of Angles of Attack and Sideslip from Radar Data and a Roll Stabilized Platform NASA - March 1972 page 2: "The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth" https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720012071 An Aircraft Model for the AIAA Controls Design Challenge NASA - 1991 - page 11: "The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat non-rotating earth" https://www.nasa.gov/centers/d....ryden/pdf/88248main_ Investigation of Aircraft Landing in Variable Wind Fields NASA 1973 - page14 pdf or 6 on actual report: a) The earth is flat and non-rotating. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790005472 A Mathematical Model of the CH-53 Helicopter NASA - page 17: “The helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with rerpect to a flat, nonrotating Earth.” https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810003557 Atmospheric Oscillations Georgia Tech April 1965 Prepared for NASA page 13: A model frequently used is that of a flat, nonrotating earth. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19650015408 page 19: These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth. https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/p... Flight Testing a VSTOL Aircraft NASA 1988 - page 9 pdf or 4-5 on actual doc: “For aircraft problems, the state and measurement models together represent the kinematics of a rigid body for describing motion over a flat, nonrotating Earth...” https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880014378 https://www.nasa.gov/centers/d....ryden/pdf/88733main_ Time to Climb https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880014378 page2: “In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat earth. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20060053337

yea that means nothing to me. engineers, pilots and NASA all use the FE model. All nasa docs say this "As if over a flat, non rotating earth" https://www.roxytube.com/watch..../35-times-government

@Shane St Pierre: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/d....ryden/pdf/88104main_

did u even watch this video before commenting? get about 10 mins in... and see what u see

yea.. i freed myself from the ignorant non sense you seem to think is real =). Not fast, just prepared dude.

Heres 168 videos that should depict how wrong your current presumptions are =) https://www.roxytube.com/watch..../space-x-rocket-hits